La présente version de l'outil Peck's English Pointers a été archivée et ne sera plus mise à jour jusqu'à son retrait définitif.
Veuillez consulter la version remaniée de l'outil Peck's English Pointers pour obtenir notre contenu le plus à jour, et n'oubliez pas de modifier vos favoris!
Ah, the comma. Doesn’t every wordsmith have some tiny wrinkles, etched somewhere in the mid-brow region, because of this capricious mark?
Nearly everyone has questions about the comma. Should we use a comma with and? What about after an introductory element? Is the comma even necessary today? Or is it a quaint, old-fashioned remnant of an era when readers had time to savour sentences, to pause between ideas instead of rushing madly onward, scanning for content before tackling the next task, as we so often do now?
It’s true that modern writers use commas more sparingly than their forebears. Pick up a novel by, say, Jane Austen. Open it to any page and you’ll see them—dozens of commas, swarming through sentences like ants through spilled syrup. But things are different today. Today our commas, like our technology, like our workplaces, like our very lives, are streamlined and economical, designed for speed and efficiency, not for lingering and reflection.
Still, some commas are as necessary today as ever. Properly placed commas enable readers to follow ideas and interpret meaning. Moreover, they prevent misreading. In the sentence Lynn, Massachusetts is an excellent location for our new headquarters, the omission of the comma after Massachusetts makes us think the author is assuring Lynn that Massachusetts is a great location.
The key to understanding the modern comma is to know when it’s required and when it’s not. This is no easy task; the guidelines for this minuscule mark fill dozens of pages in some texts. Thankfully, Sheridan Baker, in his fifth edition of The Practical Stylist (1981), divides necessary commas into just four categories:
When the introductory element is a clause, the decision is easy: use a comma. (Remember, a clause is a group of words that contains both a subject and a verb.)
With an introductory phrase, the decision is harder. (A phrase is a group of words that does not contain both a subject and a verb.) If the phrase is relatively long, use a comma.
If the phrase is short and naturally flows into what follows, do not use a comma.
If the phrase is short but does not naturally flow into what follows, use a comma to show the separation. A comma is particularly important after an introductory participial phrase—one that contains the present participle (-ing form) or the past participle (-ed or irregular form) of a verb.
The introducer may also appear after an introductory word that does not flow directly into the rest of the sentence, such as a sentence adverb (an adverb that modifies the entire sentence rather than just one word in it).
Place a comma before a coordinating conjunction that joins two independent clauses (clauses that can stand as full sentences). Remember to put the comma before the conjunction, not after.
If the independent clauses are short and closely related, it is preferable to omit the comma.
It’s important to check that the coordinating conjunction is really joining two independent clauses and not two phrases.
Think of the two commas around insertions as detour signs: the first tells you where the detour begins, the second where it ends.
Sometimes it’s hard to decide if a group of words is a true insertion. An insertion interrupts, meaning you can usually remove it without changing the sentence’s main message. The grammatical term for an interrupting element is non-restrictive. A non-restrictive element must be set off with a pair of commas.
A restrictive element, on the other hand, does not interrupt the message; it is integral to it. Restrictive elements are not set off with commas.
Use a comma whenever you link extra (often non-restrictive) information to the main sentence. The added information often provides elaboration.
Commas also link elements in a list or series.
Should there be a comma before and in a list? It’s a perennial question, one that authorities differ on. The bottom line—either approach is acceptable, though the modern tendency is to omit the comma unless it’s needed to prevent misreading.
Knowing when we need commas is only one navigation point; knowing when we don’t is another. Between the two lies a vast and bewildering territory where comma use is subjective, dependent on such vagaries as authorial intent, emphasis and personal taste. So understanding the principles of necessary commas likely won’t erase our wrinkles (we’re not talking Botox here). But it may relax them, somewhat.
© Services publics et Approvisionnement Canada, 2024
TERMIUM Plus®, la banque de données terminologiques et linguistiques du gouvernement du Canada
Outils d'aide à la rédaction – Peck's English Pointers
Un produit du Bureau de la traduction