This version of Favourite Articles has been archived and won't be updated before it is permanently deleted.
Please consult the revamped version of Favourite Articles for the most up-to-date content, and don't forget to update your bookmarks!
Few things can wreak havoc with a happy marriage, a profitable partnership or a grammatical sentence as decidedly as a lack of agreement. Take this sentence, for instance, which lurched out at me from the pages of a recent travel magazine:
One has to wonder whether the writer and editor were freely sampling these wines when preparing the article, because the sentence features a classic lack of agreement: the verb (offer) does not agree with its subject (lineup).
This error is classic because it mirrors the pattern of most agreement errors. The author (perhaps helped by a nice Shiraz) was distracted by the prepositional phrase of wines, whose plural sense makes it easy to forget that the simple (or main) subject of the sentence is the singular lineup. Prepositional phrases often lead writers astray because of their proximity to the verb: "wines offer" sounds better than "wines offers." For that reason, ignoring the ear is a wise idea when checking agreement.
Regardless of how things sound, agreement is based on a straightforward principle: the verb agrees with its simple subject—the main noun or pronoun in the subject minus any modifiers. Modifiers include adjectives or groups of words (such as prepositional phrases) that describe the simple subject. It’s a straightforward principle, yet it can sometimes go horribly wrong.
When does a prepositional phrase not look like a prepositional phrase? When the preposition involved is a substitute for and. Here are some common examples:
Make no mistake about it—these prepositions mean roughly the same thing as and, but grammatically speaking they are poles apart. As prepositions, their job is to begin prepositional phrases, which can only modify the simple subject, not add to it. Here’s an example:
To many, the verb in this sentence sounds wrong. As with the magazine example above, the ear favours "manuscripts take." But as is so often the case with grammar, our brain must wrest control from our ear. The simple subject is photo, a singular; the along with phrase, as a prepositional phrase, modifies the simple subject rather than adding to it.
Note that the commas in the above example play no part in the agreement. True, they set off the prepositional phrase and make it parenthetical, or less essential to the sentence, but they don’t affect the simple subject. Similar sentences without commas follow the same rule:
Here again, the simple subject is Esmerelda; the together with phrase merely modifies. The sentence sounds awkward, but it’s correct.
Of course, awkward wording is not a good thing, even when it’s correct. One way to be both correct and natural in a sentence like the one above is to use and in the subject instead of a preposition. As a coordinating conjunction, and coordinates words, puts them on an equal grammatical footing. In the first example above, and would make both photo and dictionaries into simple subjects, and the verb would become plural, take.
Normally, and is a reliable conjunction. It creates a compound out of two or more subjects, a compound that is nearly always plural. But occasionally and gets gluey and joins subjects so closely that they become one. This happens when the subjects refer to a single activity, concept or person.
A word of warning: for this exceptional treatment of and to kick in, the parts of the compound subject must truly refer to a single thing. How would you handle this sentence?
It’s tempting, especially if relying on what sounds good, to choose makes, the singular. But look carefully. Maria’s disposition, her personality, is one thing; her success in the business world is another. The subjects are closely related, but they are separate concepts and are therefore plural. The right choice is make.
What and hath joined together, or and nor put asunder. As coordinating conjunctions, or and nor create compound subjects just as and does, but their meaning keeps the subjects apart. Think about it—if you are going on this trip or that trip, you are not going on two trips.
The separation imposed by or and nor makes these two conjunctions difficult to agree with. Happily, the rule for or and nor, though seldom known and even less often followed, is simple. The verb always agrees with the subject that is closer to it in the sentence. Ironically, given the pitfalls of proximity we looked at earlier, this is one time when closeness counts.
All three of these sentences are correct, but the last two, because they involve plural subjects but singular verbs, may sound odd to some. In the interest of both being right and sounding right, it might make sense to reverse the subjects.
This is the first of two articles on agreement. Part 2 will appear in the next issue.
© Public Services and Procurement Canada, 2024
TERMIUM Plus®, the Government of Canada's terminology and linguistic data bank
Writing tools – Favourite Articles
A product of the Translation Bureau