This version of Peck's English Pointers has been archived and won't be updated before it is permanently deleted.
Please consult the revamped version of Peck's English Pointers for the most up-to-date content, and don't forget to update your bookmarks!
Few things wreak havoc with a happy marriage, a profitable partnership or a grammatical sentence like a lack of agreement. Take this sentence, for instance, which lurched out at me from the pages of a travel magazine:
You have to wonder what the author and editor were tasting while preparing the article, because the sentence features a classic lack of agreement: the verb (offer) does not agree with its subject (lineup).
This error is classic because it mirrors the pattern of most agreement errors. The author (or editor), perhaps helped by a nice Shiraz, was distracted by the prepositional phrase of wines, whose plural sense makes it easy to forget that the simple (or main) subject of the sentence is the singular lineup. Prepositional phrases often lead writers astray because of their proximity to the verb: "wines offer" sounds better than "wines offers." That’s why ignoring your ear is a wise idea when checking agreement.
Regardless of how things sound, agreement is based on a straightforward principle: the verb agrees with its simple subject—the main noun or pronoun in the subject minus any modifiers. Modifiers include adjectives or groups of words (such as prepositional phrases) that describe the simple subject.
It’s a straightforward principle, but it can sometimes go horribly wrong.
When does a prepositional phrase not look like a prepositional phrase? When the preposition involved replaces and. Here are some examples:
All of these prepositions mean roughly the same thing as and, but grammatically speaking they are poles apart. As prepositions, their job is to begin prepositional phrases, which can only modify the simple subject, not add to it. Consider this sentence:
To many, the verb in this sentence sounds wrong. As with the magazine example above, the ear favours "manuscripts take." But as is so often the case with grammar, our brain must control our ear. The simple subject is photo, which is singular. The along with phrase, because it’s a prepositional phrase, modifies the singular subject rather than adding to it.
Note that the commas in the above example play no part in the agreement. True, they make the prepositional phrase parenthetical, or less essential to the sentence, but they don’t affect the number of the simple subject. Similar sentences without commas follow the same rule:
Here, the simple subject is the singular Esmerelda; once again, the together with phrase merely modifies. The sentence sounds awkward, but it’s correct.
Of course, awkward wording is never a good thing, even when it’s correct. One way to be both natural and correct in a sentence like the one above is to use and in the subject instead of a preposition. And, as a coordinating conjunction, coordinates words, putting them on an equal grammatical footing. In the example above, and would make both Esmerelda and minions into simple subjects, and the verb would become plural, support.
Normally and is a reliable conjunction. It creates a compound out of two or more subjects, a compound that’s nearly always plural. But occasionally and gets gluey and joins subjects so closely that they become one. This happens when the subjects refer to a single activity, concept or person.
A word of warning: for this unusual treatment of and to kick in, the parts of the compound subject must truly refer to a single thing. How would you handle this sentence?
It’s tempting, especially if relying on what sounds good, to choose makes, the singular. But look carefully. Maria’s disposition, her personality, is one thing; her success in the business world is another. The subjects are closely related, but they are separate concepts and are therefore plural. The right choice is make.
What and hath joined together, or and nor put asunder. As coordinating conjunctions, or and nor create compound subjects just as and does, but their meaning keeps the subjects apart. Think about it—if you are going on this trip or that trip, you are not going on two trips.
The separation imposed by or and nor makes these two conjunctions difficult to agree with. Happily, the rule for or and nor, though little known and seldom followed, is simple. The verb always agrees with the subject that is closer to it in the sentence. Ironically, given the pitfalls of proximity we looked at earlier, this is one time when closeness counts.
All three of these sentences are correct, but the last two, because they involve plural subjects but singular verbs, may sound odd to some. In the interest of both being right and sounding right, it might make sense to reverse the subjects.
These are just some of the constructions that can interfere with subject-verb agreement in an otherwise harmonious sentence. For others, see More Dubious Agreement.
© Public Services and Procurement Canada, 2024
TERMIUM Plus®, the Government of Canada's terminology and linguistic data bank
Writing tools – Peck's English Pointers
A product of the Translation Bureau